Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Mabel McBride, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, vs. Board of Election Commissioners of St. Louis County, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/mabel-mcbride-et-al-plaintiffs-respondents-v-board-of-election-commission-17552
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17552
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Mabel+McBride%2C+et+al.%2C+Plaintiffs-Respondents%2C+vs.+Board+of+Election+Commissioners+of+St.+Louis+County%2C+et+al.%2C+Defendants-Appellants.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Mabel McBride, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, vs. Board of Election Commissioners of St. Louis 
County, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Case Number:  No. 72108
Handdown Date:  05/20/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Patrick Clifford
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam.
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.
Opinion:

O R D E R
Per Curiam
Before: AHRENS, P.J., CRANDALL, JR. & KAROHL, JJ.
This expedited appeal involves an election contest.  The trial court found election ballot irregularities "were of 
sufficient magnitude to cast doubt on the validity of the initial election pursuant to [section] 115.593 RSMo 1986."  It set 
aside the election of August 6, 1996, which resulted in certification a Fire Protection District levy had passed.  It ordered a 
new election for the "statutory election date in June, 1997." 
We find no error of law on undisputed facts.  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We affirm.  
Rule 84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.