Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Machinery, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v Hale Design/Build, Inc., Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/machinery-inc-et-al-plaintiffsrespondents-v-hale-designbuild-inc-defendan-12637
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12637
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Machinery%2C+Inc.%2C+et+al.%2C+Plaintiffs%2FRespondents%2C+v+Hale+Design%2FBuild%2C+Inc.%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Machinery, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v Hale Design/Build, Inc., Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  71841
Handdown Date:  03/03/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Robert Lee Campbell
Counsel for Appellant:  William James O'Herin
Counsel for Respondent:  Gregory P. White
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crahan, C.J.,Teitelman, J. and Blackmar, Sr.J.
Opinion:
ORDER
Subcontractor appeals the judgment granting motion to enforce its settlement with contractor and owner.  We 
have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.  An extended opinion would have 
no precedential value.  However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, 
setting forth the reasons for this order.  The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.