Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Margaret Dent, Employee/Appellant, v. The Body Shop, Employer/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: employment
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/margaret-dent-employeeappellant-v-the-body-shop-employerrespondent-17341
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17341
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Margaret+Dent%2C+Employee%2FAppellant%2C+v.+The+Body+Shop%2C+Employer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+employment%3B+text%3A+employee&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: employment, text: employee, text: employer)
- Workers' Compensation: https://ott.law/practice-areas/workers-compensation?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=workers-compensation&ott_archive_query=Margaret+Dent%2C+Employee%2FAppellant%2C+v.+The+Body+Shop%2C+Employer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+labor+and+industrial+relations+commission%3B+text%3A+workers%27+compensation&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: workers-compensation; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: labor and industrial relations commission, text: workers' compensation)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Margaret Dent, Employee/Appellant, v. The Body Shop, Employer/Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 71632
Handdown Date:  07/08/1997
Appeal From:  Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Counsel for Appellant:  Leland C. Smith
Counsel for Respondent:  William Gallagher
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  Affirmed.  Before Reinhard, P.J., Karohl, J., and Dowd, J.
Opinion:
DIVISION SIX
O R D E R
Claimant appeals the denial of her claim for workers' compensation benefits by the Labor and Industrial Relations 
Commission (Commission).  We affirm.
The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the 
whole record, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value.   The parties have been furnished with a 
memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 
84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.