Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Mark C. Brennan, Petitioner, v. Virginia K. Brennan, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: family-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/mark-c-brennan-petitioner-v-virginia-k-brennan-respondent-12541
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12541
Related Practice Areas:
- Family Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/family?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=family&ott_archive_query=Mark+C.+Brennan%2C+Petitioner%2C+v.+Virginia+K.+Brennan%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+family-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: family; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: family-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Mark C. Brennan, Petitioner, v. Virginia K. Brennan, Respondent.
Case Number:  70628
Handdown Date:  10/28/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Joseph A. Goeke, III
Counsel for Appellant:  Lawrence Gillespie
Counsel for Respondent:  John Hilton and Joyce Capshaw
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R 
Mark C. Brennan appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered on an action for dissolution of marriage.  The 
judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears.  An 
opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.