Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Mark Whitehead, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/mark-whitehead-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-12758
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12758
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Mark+Whitehead%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Mark Whitehead, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  72129
Handdown Date:  02/17/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach
Counsel for Appellant:  Mary C. McWilliams
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris and Karen L. Kramer
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Mark Whitehead, Movant, appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction 
relief.  Movant filed the motion after his convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action. 
We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's determination is 
not clearly erroneous.   Rule 24.035(k).   An extended opinion would have no precedential value.   We have, however, 
prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only.  We affirm the 
judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.