Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Melvin Hardy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/melvin-hardy-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-13113
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13113
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Melvin+Hardy%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Melvin Hardy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  72630
Handdown Date:  03/10/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas J. Frawley
Counsel for Appellant:  David Hemingway
Counsel for Respondent:  Elizabeth L. Ziegler
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  R. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely.  He concedes 
his motion was filed out of time.  We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that 
the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous.  Rule 24.035(k); State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Mo. banc 
1992).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.