Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Nicholas Gibson, et al., Appellants, v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: personal-injury
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/nicholas-gibson-et-al-appellants-v-state-farm-fire-casualty-insurance-com-13405
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13405
Related Practice Areas:
- Insurance Bad Faith: https://ott.law/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=insurance-bad-faith&ott_archive_query=Nicholas+Gibson%2C+et+al.%2C+Appellants%2C+v.+State+Farm+Fire+%26+Casualty+Insurance+Company%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=22&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+casualty+insurance+company%3B+text%3A+insurance+company&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: insurance-bad-faith; source: text; score: 22; evidence: text: casualty insurance company, text: insurance company, text: insurance carrier party signal)
- Personal Injury: https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=personal-injury&ott_archive_query=Nicholas+Gibson%2C+et+al.%2C+Appellants%2C+v.+State+Farm+Fire+%26+Casualty+Insurance+Company%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+personal-injury%3B+fallback+personal-injury+route+behind+specific+injury+signal&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: personal-injury; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: personal-injury, fallback personal-injury route behind specific injury signal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Nicholas Gibson, et al., Appellants, v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Respondents.
Case Number:  73506
Handdown Date:  09/08/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Julian Bush
Counsel for Appellant:  Ronald Rothman
Counsel for Respondent:  Gerard Noce and Christiana Rush
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.   J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
 
ORDER
Appellants appeal the judgment of the trial court entered on a jury verdict in favor of respondent on their action for 
negligence on the part of respondent.  Appellants claim that respondent negligently failed to issue a policy of automobile 
liability insurance naming them as insureds.  On appeal, appellants contend that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a 
mistrial or, alternatively, a new trial based on respondent's counsel's reference to appellants' failure to produce a witness 
who was equally available to both parties.
We have reviewed the briefs and the record.  No error of law appears.  An opinion reciting the detailed facts and 
restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.  The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to 
Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:

None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.