Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)
Case Number: SD32035
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/orders-pursuant-to-rules-3025b-andor-8416b-d32035
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=58072
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Orders+Pursuant+to+Rules+30.25%28b%29+and%2For+84.16%28b%29&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

November 15, 2012 
 
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b). 
 
1. SD32035 GREGORY K. LENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, 
   GREG LENZ, et al., and SHO-ME EMBRYOS, Plaintiffs, 
   v. CORK CATTLE COMPANY, and KEVIN KLEINMAN, and 
    NEYSA KLEINMAN, Defendants-Respondents. 
 
 
 
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 30.25(b). 
 
1. SD31831 STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, 
   v. WILLIAM H. AUSTIN, Appellant.