Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)
Case Number: SD32768
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: employment
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/orders-pursuant-to-rules-3025b-andor-8416b-d32768
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=69609
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Orders+Pursuant+to+Rules+30.25%28b%29+and%2For+84.16%28b%29&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+employment&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: employment)

---
## Opinion

JANUARY 24, 2014 
 
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).  
 
1. Case No.  SD32768 
 
 Re: JENNIFER THOMAS, 
  Claimant-Respondent, 
  vs. 
  FORSYTH CARE CENTER, 
  Employer-Appellant, 
  and 
  MISSOURI NURSING HOME 
  INSURANCE TRUST, Insurer-Appellant. 
 
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b). 
 
1. Case No.  SD32579 
 
 Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, 
  Plaintiff-Respondent, 
  vs. 
  JAMES A. KIMMEL-TAYLOR, 
  Defendant-Appellant.