Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Paul Leisure, Claimant, v. LN & P Towing/Labor Local 42, Employers.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: employment
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/paul-leisure-claimant-v-ln-p-towinglabor-local-42-employers-12800
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12800
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Paul+Leisure%2C+Claimant%2C+v.+LN+%26+P+Towing%2FLabor+Local+42%2C+Employers.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+employment&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: employment)
- Workers' Compensation: https://ott.law/practice-areas/workers-compensation?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=workers-compensation&ott_archive_query=Paul+Leisure%2C+Claimant%2C+v.+LN+%26+P+Towing%2FLabor+Local+42%2C+Employers.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+labor+and+industrial+relations+commission%3B+text%3A+workers%27+compensation&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: workers-compensation; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: labor and industrial relations commission, text: workers' compensation)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Paul Leisure, Claimant, v. LN & P Towing/Labor Local 42, Employers.
Case Number:  71934
Handdown Date:  10/28/1997
Appeal From:  Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Counsel for Appellant:  Robert E. Keaney
Counsel for Respondent:  Betsy J. Levitt, Adrian P. Sulser and John R. Geiss
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R
Employee appeals dismissal of his workers' compensation claim.  An extended opinion would have no 
precedential value.  The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the 
reasons for the order affirming the judgment.  Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.