Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Rennie L. Kennedy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/rennie-l-kennedy-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-19344
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=19344
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Rennie+L.+Kennedy%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: sentence)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  Rennie L. Kennedy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 53657
Handdown Date:  07/29/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Boone County, Hon. Sanford F. Conley IV
Counsel for Appellant:  Gary E. Brotherton
Counsel for Respondent:  John Munson Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant was charged and pled guilty to one count of second degree burglary, one count of second degree 
assault, and three counts of fraudulent use of a credit device.  A sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment was 
imposed.  Appellant now claims ineffective assistance of counsel, Rule 24.035, because her sentence was not similar to 
that of her co-defendant.  Affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.