Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Richard B. Hafley, Jr., Claimant/Appellant, v. Thomas, Phylis, and Cherie Sebastian, d/b/a U.S. Auto, Employer/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: employment
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/richard-b-hafley-jr-claimantappellant-v-thomas-phylis-and-cherie-sebastia-13033
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13033
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Richard+B.+Hafley%2C+Jr.%2C+Claimant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+Thomas%2C+Phylis%2C+and+Cherie+Sebastian%2C+d%2Fb%2Fa+U.S.+Auto%2C+Employer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+employment%3B+text%3A+employer&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: employment, text: employer)
- Workers' Compensation: https://ott.law/practice-areas/workers-compensation?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=workers-compensation&ott_archive_query=Richard+B.+Hafley%2C+Jr.%2C+Claimant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+Thomas%2C+Phylis%2C+and+Cherie+Sebastian%2C+d%2Fb%2Fa+U.S.+Auto%2C+Employer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+labor+and+industrial+relations+commission&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: workers-compensation; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: labor and industrial relations commission)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Richard B. Hafley, Jr., Claimant/Appellant, v. Thomas, Phylis, and Cherie Sebastian, d/b/a U.S. Auto, 
Employer/Respondent.
Case Number:  72712
Handdown Date:  03/17/1998
Appeal From:  Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Counsel for Appellant:  Party Acting Pro Se
Counsel for Respondent:  Thomas Sebastian
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of 
the Administrative Law Judge denying compensation.   The order of the Commission is supported by competent and 
substantial evidence on the whole record and is not against the weight of the evidence.  No error of law appears.  An 
extended opinion would have no precedential value.   The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their 
information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.