Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Richard Steven Bosworth, Appellant, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/richard-steven-bosworth-appellant-v-director-of-revenue-state-of-missouri-13037
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13037
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Richard+Steven+Bosworth%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Director+of+Revenue%2C+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Richard Steven Bosworth, Appellant, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  72725
Handdown Date:  04/28/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Frank E. Tolen
Counsel for Appellant:  Mark R. Bahn
Counsel for Respondent:  Evan J. Buchheim
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER 
Richard Steven Bosworth (Appellant) appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for review of the Department 
of Revenue's denial of an administrative hearing pursuant to section 302.530.1 RSMo Supp. 1996. 
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal.  The trial court's judgment is supported by 
substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence.  No error of law appears.  An extended opinion reciting 
the   detailed   facts   and   restating   the   principles   of   law   would   have   no   precedential   or   jurisprudential   value.     Judgment 
affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.