Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Rosetta Weintraub, Personal Representative of the Estate of Geraldine Drucker, deceased, Appellant, v. Barry Drucker and Sandra Drucker, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/rosetta-weintraub-personal-representative-of-the-estate-of-geraldine-druc-12599
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12599
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Rosetta+Weintraub%2C+Personal+Representative+of+the+Estate+of+Geraldine+Drucker%2C+deceased%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Barry+Drucker+and+Sandra+Drucker%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)
- Estate Planning: https://ott.law/practice-areas/estate-planning?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=estate-planning&ott_archive_query=Rosetta+Weintraub%2C+Personal+Representative+of+the+Estate+of+Geraldine+Drucker%2C+deceased%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Barry+Drucker+and+Sandra+Drucker%2C+Respondents.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+personal+representative&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: estate-planning; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: personal representative)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Rosetta Weintraub, Personal Representative of the Estate of Geraldine Drucker, deceased, Appellant, 
v. Barry Drucker and Sandra Drucker, Respondents.
Case Number:  71737
Handdown Date:  11/11/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Mark D. Seigel
Counsel for Appellant:  Irl B. Baris & Jon M. Baris
Counsel for Respondent:  Jack B. Spooner
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action for an accounting.  There is sufficient evidence to 
support the judgment.  No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. 
However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and 
reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.