Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Ruth Floyd, Employee/Appellant, v. McMillan/McGraw-Hill, Employer/Respondent, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: employment
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ruth-floyd-employeeappellant-v-mcmillanmcgraw-hill-employerrespondent-and-12949
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12949
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Ruth+Floyd%2C+Employee%2FAppellant%2C+v.+McMillan%2FMcGraw-Hill%2C+Employer%2FRespondent%2C+and+Lumbermens+Mutual+Casualty+Co.%2C+Insurer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+employment%3B+text%3A+employee&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: employment, text: employee, text: employer)
- Insurance Bad Faith: https://ott.law/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=insurance-bad-faith&ott_archive_query=Ruth+Floyd%2C+Employee%2FAppellant%2C+v.+McMillan%2FMcGraw-Hill%2C+Employer%2FRespondent%2C+and+Lumbermens+Mutual+Casualty+Co.%2C+Insurer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+insurer&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: insurance-bad-faith; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: insurer)
- Workers' Compensation: https://ott.law/practice-areas/workers-compensation?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=workers-compensation&ott_archive_query=Ruth+Floyd%2C+Employee%2FAppellant%2C+v.+McMillan%2FMcGraw-Hill%2C+Employer%2FRespondent%2C+and+Lumbermens+Mutual+Casualty+Co.%2C+Insurer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+labor+and+industrial+relations+commission&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: workers-compensation; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: labor and industrial relations commission)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Ruth Floyd, Employee/Appellant, v. McMillan/McGraw-Hill, Employer/Respondent, and Lumbermens 
Mutual Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
Case Number:  72284
Handdown Date:  12/16/1997
Appeal From:  Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Counsel for Appellant:  Evan J. Beatty
Counsel for Respondent:  Jeffrey J. Estes
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr. and Karohl, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R
The award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by substantial and competent 
evidence.  An extended opinion would not have precedential value.  The parties have been furnished with a memorandum 
for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order.  Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.