Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Ryan D. Gans, a minor, by and through his Father and Next Friend, David Gans, and David Gans, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MDF, Inc. a/k/a Midwest Davco, and Davco Restaurants, Inc., Defendant-Respondent, and Mark J. Osak, Karen Osak, and Adam M. Osak, Defendants.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/ryan-d-gans-a-minor-by-and-through-his-father-and-next-friend-david-gans-12882
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12882
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Ryan+D.+Gans%2C+a+minor%2C+by+and+through+his+Father+and+Next+Friend%2C+David+Gans%2C+and+David+Gans%2C+Plaintiffs-Appellants%2C+v.+MDF%2C+Inc.+a%2Fk%2Fa+Midwest+Davco%2C+and+Davco+Restaurants%2C+Inc.%2C+Defendant-Respondent%2C+and+Mark+J.+Osak%2C+Karen+Osak%2C+and+Adam+M.+Osak%2C+Defendants.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Ryan D. Gans, a minor, by and through his Father and Next Friend, David Gans, and David Gans, 
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MDF, Inc. a/k/a Midwest Davco, and Davco Restaurants, Inc., Defendant-Respondent, and 
Mark J. Osak, Karen Osak, and Adam M. Osak, Defendants.
Case Number:  72403
Handdown Date:  12/16/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr.
Counsel for Appellant:  Stephen H. Ringkamp & John E. Hullverson
Counsel for Respondent:  Joseph R. Swift, T. Michael Ward & Bart B. Zuckerman
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R
Defendant appeals dismissal of cause of action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.  
Affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.