Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Senikica Blackmon, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/senikica-blackmon-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-13001
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13001
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Senikica+Blackmon%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Senikica Blackmon, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  72494
Handdown Date:  01/13/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. John W. Grimm
Counsel for Appellant:  A. Renae Adamson
Counsel for Respondent:  Elizabeth L. Ziegler
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.  We have reviewed 
the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous.  Rule 
24.035(k).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion 
setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only.  We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.