Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Shirley Rahe, Claimant/Appellant, v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., Employer/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: employment
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/shirley-rahe-claimantappellant-v-schnuck-markets-inc-employerrespondent-17271
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17271
Related Practice Areas:
- Employment Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/employment?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=employment&ott_archive_query=Shirley+Rahe%2C+Claimant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+Schnuck+Markets%2C+Inc.%2C+Employer%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+employment%3B+text%3A+employer&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: employment; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: employment, text: employer, text: employee)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Shirley Rahe, Claimant/Appellant, v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., Employer/Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 71547
Handdown Date:  06/24/1997
Appeal From:  Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.
Opinion:

ORDER
Shirley   Rahe   (Employee)   appeals   from   the   Final  Award   Denying   Compensation   of   the   Labor   and   Industrial 
Relations Commission (Commission).   Employee alleges the Commission erred because its award is not supported by 
sufficient and competent evidence.   We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the 
claims of error to be without merit.  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  The judgment of the trial court 
is affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.