Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: South East Missouri Bank, Respondent, v. United Security Insurance, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: insurance
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/south-east-missouri-bank-respondent-v-united-security-insurance-appellant-12840
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12840
Related Practice Areas:
- Insurance Bad Faith: https://ott.law/practice-areas/insurance-bad-faith?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=insurance-bad-faith&ott_archive_query=South+East+Missouri+Bank%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+United+Security+Insurance%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+insurance%3B+text%3A+insurer&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: insurance-bad-faith; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: insurance, text: insurer)
- Personal Injury: https://ott.law/practice-areas/personal-injury?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=personal-injury&ott_archive_query=South+East+Missouri+Bank%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+United+Security+Insurance%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=1&ott_archive_link_evidence=related+personal-injury+route+for+specific+injury+signal&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: personal-injury; source: text; score: 1; evidence: related personal-injury route for specific injury signal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  South East Missouri Bank, Respondent, v. United Security Insurance, Appellant.
Case Number:  72034
Handdown Date:  01/13/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. John W. Grimm
Counsel for Appellant:  John R. Hopkins, Jr.
Counsel for Respondent:  Malcolm Henry Montgomery
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crahan, C.J., J. Dowd and Blackmar, Sr., JJ., concur.
Opinion:
Insurer appeals the judgment entered in favor of Bank on a policy entered into between Insurer and a third-party 
debtor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion 
would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.