Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State ex rel. Douglas Sharp, et al., Relators, v. Honorable Kenneth M. Romines, Judge, Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, Div. 10, Respondent.
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: transferred
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-ex-rel-douglas-sharp-et-al-relators-v-honorable-kenneth-m-romines-j-25911
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=25911
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+ex+rel.+Douglas+Sharp%2C+et+al.%2C+Relators%2C+v.+Honorable+Kenneth+M.+Romines%2C+Judge%2C+Circuit+Court+of+St.+Louis+County%2C+Missouri%2C+Div.+10%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion

Case Style:  State ex rel. Douglas Sharp, et al., Relators, v. Honorable Kenneth M. Romines, Judge, Circuit Court 
of St. Louis County, Missouri, Div. 10, Respondent.
Case Number:  81020
Handdown Date:  02/09/1999
Appeal From:  Original Proceeding in Prohibition
Counsel for Appellant:  Robert Herman
Counsel for Respondent:  William F. Arnet, Marvin E. Wright and Phillip J. Hoskins
Opinion Summary: 
The respondent judge found that venue for this suit against the University of Missouri was proper in St. Louis 
County, where it was filed, but transferred it to Boone County concluding St. Louis County was not a convenient forum.
PRELIMINARY ORDER MADE PERMANENT.
Court en banc holds:  Having found St. Louis County was a proper venue, the court cannot transfer the case to 
another county based on the doctrine of an inconvenient forum. 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  PRELIMINARY ORDER MADE PERMANENT.  Benton, C.J., Limbaugh, Covington, White and Wolff, 
JJ., and Barney and Karohl, Sp.JJ., concur.  Price and Holstein, JJ., not participating.
Opinion:
Relators filed a class action in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County.  The petition asserts that the University of 
Missouri has charged tuition in violation of section 172.360, RSMo.  A declaratory judgment, injunctive relief and refunds 
are the relief sought.  The University of Missouri filed a motion asserting venue was improper in the city of St. Louis.   The 
respondent judge found that venue was proper in St. Louis County but that St. Louis County was not a convenient forum 

for the suit.  He, therefore, ordered the case transferred to Boone County.  Relators seek a writ from this Court prohibiting 
the transfer of this case to Boone County.
Missouri's venue statutes do not permit an intrastate application of the doctrine of inconvenient forum.  Anglim v. 
Missouri Pacific R. Co., 832 S.W.2d 298, 302 (Mo. banc 1992).   "The statutory designation of proper venue as the site 
where the cause of action accrued presupposes legislative determination that it cannot be overly inconvenient for a 
defendant to appear in that location."  Willman v. McMillen, 779 S.W.2d 583, 586 (Mo. banc 1989).  Having found that 
the defendant in the underlying cause is subject to venue in St. Louis County, the respondent was not permitted to order 
the case transferred to another county on the basis of forum non conveniens.
The preliminary order in prohibition is made permanent.
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.