Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Anna Jeanne Blackwell, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-anna-jeanne-blackwell-defendantap-17618
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17618
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Anna+Jeanne+Blackwell%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: sentence)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Anna Jeanne Blackwell, Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  No. 70610
Handdown Date:  08/26/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Ste. Genevieve County, Hon. Kenneth W. Pratte
Counsel for Appellant:  Arthur S. Margulis and Linda Hogan
Counsel for Respondent:  Joanne E. Joiner
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Smith and Pudlowski, JJ., concur.
Opinion:

O R D E R
Defendant, Anna Jeanne Blackwell, appeals from her sentence of nine months imprisonment in the county jail and 
a $20,000 fine following a finding of guilty by a jury of felony stealing by deceit.  Section 570.030 RSMo 1994.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears.  As we 
further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court pursuant to 
Rule 30.25(b).  A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our 
decision.
Judgment affirmed.
Separate Opinion:
None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.