Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Boaz Rafaeli, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-boaz-rafaeli-defendantappellant-16612
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=16612
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Boaz+Rafaeli%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Boaz Rafaeli, Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  No. 70777
Handdown Date:  06/17/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Ellis Gregory
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  Before Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., Gerald M. Smith and James A. Pudlowski, JJ.
Opinion:

ORDER
Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence after a jury-waived trial on one count of harassment in violation of 
section 560.090.1(1) RSMo 1994.  He was sentenced to a term of six months in the St. Louis County jail.
No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.  However, the 
parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for 
this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.