Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Bsil Whitby, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-bsil-whitby-defendantappellant-12587
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12587
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Bsil+Whitby%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Bsil Whitby, Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  71164
Handdown Date:  11/25/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. William L. Syler
Counsel for Appellant:  Deborah B. Wafer
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, III, and Daniel G. Cierpiot
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and James R. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of first degree 
assault,   in   violation   of   section   565.050   RSMo   1994,   on   each   of   which   he   was   sentenced   to   twenty-five   years 
imprisonment, and of two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994, on each of which 
he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment, all to be served consecutively. 
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the 
principles of law.  However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting 
forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.