Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dominic Belford, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-dominic-belford-defendantappellan-12679
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12679
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Dominic+Belford%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dominic Belford, Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  71590
Handdown Date:  03/17/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Sherri Sullivan
Counsel for Appellant:  Deborah B. Wafer
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, III, and Breck K. Burgess
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
A jury found defendant, Dominic Belford, guilty of murder in the second degree, in violation of Section 565.021 
RSMo (1994); armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo (1994); and unlawful use of a weapon, in 
violation of Section 571.030 RSMo (1994).  He was sentenced to consecutive terms of ten and three years imprisonment 
and fined $1,000.00.  Defendant appeals from the second degree murder and armed criminal action convictions.
No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.  However, the 
parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for 
this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.