Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kevin Lucious, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-kevin-lucious-defendantappellant-12703
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12703
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Kevin+Lucious%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kevin Lucious, Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  71673
Handdown Date:  03/03/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. David Mason
Counsel for Appellant:  Michael D. Burton
Counsel for Respondent:  Karen L. Kramer
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Russell, and  R. Dowd, J.J.
Opinion:
ORDER
Opinion modified by Court's own motion on April 14, 1998.  This substitution does not constitute a new 
opinion.
Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree murder, Section 565.020 RSMo 1994; first degree assault, 
Section 565.050 RSMo 1994; and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 1994.  The trial court 
found him to be a prior and persistent offender.  He was sentenced to a life term without the possibility of parole for 
murder in the first degree and to three consecutive life sentences on the other three counts.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion.  However, the parties have been furnished 
with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). 
Separate Opinion:

None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.