Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Carter, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-michael-carter-defendantappellant-12736
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12736
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Michael+Carter%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Carter, Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  71911
Handdown Date:  06/09/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Bernhardt Drumm
Counsel for Appellant:  Paul Yarns
Counsel for Respondent:  John Morris, III, and Gregory Barnes
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Michael Carter(Defendant)appeals from judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of Burglary in the 
First Degree, in violation of Section 569.160, RSMo 1994; unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030, 
RSMo Supp. 1995; kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, RSMo 1994; armed criminal action, in violation of Section 
571.015, RSMo 1994; and endangering the welfare of a child, in violation of Section 568.050, RSMo 1994.   He was 
sentenced to serve concurrent terms of imprisonment for five years for Burglary in the First Degree and Unlawful Use of a 
Weapon; a concurrent ten-year term of imprisonment for Kidnapping; a concurrent seven-year term of imprisonment for 
Armed   Criminal  Action;   and   a   consecutive   one-year  term   of   imprisonment   and   payment   of   a   fine   of   $1,000   for 
Endangering the Welfare of a Child.   
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without 
merit.   An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The 

judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).  
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.