Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Duke, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-michael-duke-defendantappellant-13467
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13467
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Michael+Duke%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Duke, Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  73366
Handdown Date:  09/22/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Franklin County, Hon. Thomas J. Brown, III
Counsel for Appellant:  Richard B. Dempsey
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, III and Shaun J. Mackelprang
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  R. Dowd, Jr., C.J., Karohl, J., and Crist, Sr. J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Defendant Michael Duke appeals from the judgment and conviction of attempted first degree-murder, Section 
564.011, RSMo 1994, and driving while intoxicated, Section 577.010, RSMo 1994, in this bench-tried case. 
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the transcript, and the legal file on appeal and find no error of law.  A 
written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and we affirm by summary order.  Judgment affirmed pursuant to 
Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.