Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Orson L. Wells, Jr., Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-plaintiffrespondent-v-orson-l-wells-jr-defendantappella-12588
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12588
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Plaintiff%2FRespondent%2C+v.+Orson+L.+Wells%2C+Jr.%2C+Defendant%2FAppellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Orson L. Wells, Jr., Defendant/Appellant.
Case Number:  71165
Handdown Date:  11/25/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Floyd McBride, Jr.
Counsel for Appellant:  Gwenda R. Robinson
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, III, and David R. Truman
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and James R. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of robbery in the 
first degree, in violation of Section 569.020 RSMo (1994); one count of attempted robbery in the first degree, in violation of 
Section 564.011 RSMo (1994); and three counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo (1994), 
for the robbery and attempted robbery of various individuals in one neighborhood over a one week period.  The trial court 
sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to consecutive terms of life imprisonment on each of Counts I and IV, 
robbery in the first degree; ten years imprisonment on each of Counts III, V, and VII, armed criminal action; and twenty 
years imprisonment on Count VI, attempted robbery in the first degree.
No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served with a written opinion.  However, the 
parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for 
this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.