Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio Gray, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-antonio-gray-appellant-12821
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12821
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Antonio+Gray%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio Gray, Appellant.
Case Number:  71990
Handdown Date:  12/09/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. John F. Kintz
Counsel for Appellant:  Irene Karns
Counsel for Respondent:  Cheryl Caponegro
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, C.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER 
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of trafficking drugs in the second 
degree.   Defendant was sentenced as a persistent drug offender to fifteen years imprisonment.   No jurisprudential 
purpose would be served by a written opinion.
The judgment is affirmed.  Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.