Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cornell Harvey, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-cornell-harvey-appellant-12704
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12704
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Cornell+Harvey%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cornell Harvey, Appellant.
Case Number:  71674
Handdown Date:  05/05/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. David C. Mason
Counsel for Appellant:  John M. Schilmoeller
Counsel for Respondent:  Meghan J. Stephens
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall and Karohl, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Defendant, Cornell Harvey, appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court on a jury's convictions of two 
counts of assault in the first degree, Section 565.050, two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, and one 
count of stealing a motor vehicle, Section 570.030.  
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential 
purpose would be served by a written opinion.  However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for 
their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.