Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent v. David E. Luster, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-david-e-luster-appellant-18249
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18249
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent+v.+David+E.+Luster%2C+Appellant&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent v. David E. Luster, Appellant
Case Number:  54811
Handdown Date:  05/26/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Charles H. Sloan
Counsel for Appellant:  Donald L. Williams
Counsel for Respondent:  John Munson Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Hanna, P.J., Stith and Smith, J.J.
Opinion:
David E. Luster appeals from the judgment of his judge-tried conviction and sentence in the Circuit Court of 
Jackson County for assault in the first degree, section 565.050, RSMo 1994.
Affirmed.  Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.