Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. David W. Preator, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: other
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-david-w-preator-appellant-18671
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18671
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+David+W.+Preator%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. David W. Preator, Appellant.
Case Number:  54321
Handdown Date:  05/26/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Clay County, Hon. Michael J. Maloney
Counsel for Appellant:  Catherine Connelkly
Counsel for Respondent:  Barbara Chesser
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Howard, P.J., Breckenridge and Spinden, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
David W. Preator appeals the circuit court's judgment convicting him of forcible sodomy after a jury trial.  We 
affirm.  Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.