Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Erik Weekly, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-erik-weekly-appellant-17939
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17939
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Erik+Weekly%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: felony)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Erik Weekly, Appellant.
Case Number:  53897
Handdown Date:  04/07/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Jay A. Daugherty
Counsel for Appellant:  Gary E. Brotherton
Counsel for Respondent:  Breck K. Burgess
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Smith, P.J., Smart and Ellis, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R
Erik M. Weekly appeals from his convictions in the Circuit Court of Jackson County for class A felony assault in 
the first degree, section 565.050, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994.  In accordance 
with the jury's recommendation, Weekly was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty and ten years in the Missouri 
Department of Corrections.
The judgment is affirmed.  Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.