Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Forrest Mittendorf, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-forrest-mittendorf-appellant-17465
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17465
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Forrest+Mittendorf%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Forrest Mittendorf, Appellant.
Case Number:  No. 70177
Handdown Date:  09/30/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Donald E. Dalton
Counsel for Appellant:  Raymund Capelovitch
Counsel for Respondent:  Fernando Bermudez
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski, and Gaertner, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant, Forrest Mittendorf ("defendant"), appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. 
Charles County, after a jury found him guilty of elder abuse in violation of RSMo section 565.180 (1994).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript.  An extended opinion would serve no 
jurisprudential purpose.  We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).  A memorandum explaining the reasons for 
our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.