Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Harry Lackey, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-harry-lackey-appellant-13400
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13400
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Harry+Lackey%2C+Appellant&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: felony)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Harry Lackey, Appellant
Case Number:  73200
Handdown Date:  10/27/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Franklin County, Hon. Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Counsel for Appellant:  Jan Shelly, David C. Hemingway and Rosemary D. McGuire
Counsel for Respondent:  John Munson Morris and Cheryl A. Caponegro
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.   Hoff, P.J., Gaertner and Russell, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of a class B felony 
sale of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.211 RSMo 1994 on which he was sentenced to twelve years 
imprisonment.
No   jurisprudential   purpose   would   be   served   by   a   written   opinion   reciting   the   detailed   facts   and   restating   the 
principles of law.  However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting 
forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.