Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Clyde Ennis, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-jeffrey-clyde-ennis-appellant-16885
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=16885
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Jeffrey+Clyde+Ennis%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Clyde Ennis, Appellant.
Case Number:  52464
Handdown Date:  12/09/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cass County, Hon. Mary Ellen Young
Counsel for Appellant:  A. Renae Adamson
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
A jury found appellant guilty of second degree assault, armed criminal action, first degree burglary, second degree 
burglary, and first degree tampering.  His appeal claims trial court error because of irrelevant evidence, and under Rule 
29.15, ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to object to an alleged improper verdict returned by the jury.
Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). 
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.