Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent,  v. Jeffrey R. Himmelmann, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-jeffrey-r-himmelmann-appellant-13128
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13128
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C++v.+Jeffrey+R.+Himmelmann%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent,  v. Jeffrey R. Himmelmann,
Appellant. 
Case Number:  72659
Handdown Date:  01/06/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Charles County,  Hon. Nancy Schneider
Counsel for Appellant:  Daniel T. Dalton
Counsel for Respondent:  Tanya Muhm
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr. & Karohl, JJ.
Opinion:
Defendant appeals sentences for driving while intoxicated, failure to stop for stop sign and two charges of failure 
to obey traffic control device entered after a jury trial.  The trial court did not err and abuse its discretion in allowing cross-
examination of defendant on prior convictions on state charges in addition to a prior driving while intoxicated conviction. 
No error of law appears.  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  The sentences are affirmed.  Rule 
84.16(b).  
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.