Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeremy Davis, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-jeremy-davis-appellant-18563
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18563
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Jeremy+Davis%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: criminal)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeremy Davis, Appellant.
Case Number:  53517
Handdown Date:  10/28/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. David W. Shinn
Counsel for Appellant:  Rosemary E. Percival
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
After jury convictions on two counts of first degree murder, one count of first degree assault, and three counts of 
armed criminal action, the defendant claims insufficient evidence of his intent and deliberation, and that a hearsay 
statement should have been allowed in evidence under Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973).  Affirmed.  Rule 
30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.