Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry Rose, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-jerry-rose-appellant-13112
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13112
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Jerry+Rose%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry Rose, Appellant.
Case Number:  72629
Handdown Date:  06/23/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Ellsworth Cundiff
Counsel for Appellant:  Paul J. D'Agrosa
Counsel for Respondent:  Karen L. Kramer
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Ahrens, P.J., Crandall and Karohl, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Defendant, Jerry Rose, appeals from the judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, for arson in 
the second degree, section 569.050, RSMo (1994).  The trial court sentenced defendant to a term of imprisonment of 
three years, in accordance with the jury's assessment of punishment; and fined him $3,000.00. 
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. 
The judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).   
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.