Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marcus Sipes, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-marcus-sipes-appellant-16949
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=16949
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Marcus+Sipes%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marcus Sipes, Appellant.
Case Number:  51440 and 53626
Handdown Date:  12/09/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Hon. Weldon C. Judah
Counsel for Appellant:  Gary E. Brotherton
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Marcus Sipes appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated for which he was sentenced as a persistent 
offender  to  two  years imprisonment.   He also  appeals  the  denial  of  his  Rule  29.15  motion for  post-conviction  relief. 
Having   carefully   considered   the   contentions   on   appeal,   we   conclude   the   judgment   should   be   affirmed.    A  published 
opinion would lack precedential value.   A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the 
parties.  Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).  
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.