Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rickie Wayne Smith, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-rickie-wayne-smith-appellant-12912
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12912
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Rickie+Wayne+Smith%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rickie Wayne Smith, Appellant.
Case Number:  72456
Handdown Date:  04/14/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, Hon. John W. Grimm
Counsel for Appellant:  Elaine A. Martin
Counsel for Respondent:  Gregory L. Barnes
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Rickie Smith appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance 
with intent to distribute or deliver pursuant to Section 195.211 RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to seven years 
imprisonment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.  An extended 
opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no precedential value.  Judgment 
affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.