Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert Fedrick, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-robert-fedrick-appellant-13244
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13244
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Robert+Fedrick%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert Fedrick, Appellant.
Case Number:  72875
Handdown Date:  07/31/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Joan M. Burger
Counsel for Appellant:  Chris Wegner and John Schilmoeller
Counsel for Respondent:  John Morris, III, and Barbara Chesser
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.   Hoff, P.J., Gaertner, and Russell, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant, Robert Fedrick, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis 
after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first degree robbery, RSMo section 569.020 (1994). 
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript.  As no jurisprudential purpose would 
be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgement pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.