Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert M. Hayes, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-robert-m-hayes-appellant-17843
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17843
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Robert+M.+Hayes%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert M. Hayes, Appellant.
Case Number:  No. 52885
Handdown Date:  08/12/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Boone County, Hon. Frank Conley
Counsel for Appellant:  Rosalynn Koch, Public Defender
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, Assistant Attorney General
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Berrey, P.J., Spinden and Smart, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Robert M. Hayes appeals his conviction, after jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo 
1994, kidnapping, Section 565.110, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015, for which he was sentenced as a prior 
and persistent offender to consecutive terms of twenty years, twenty years and five years, respectively.  This court has 
carefully considered the arguments on appeal, and found them to be without merit.  A published opinion would not have 
precedential value.  A memorandum opinion as to the reasons for the decision has been furnished to the parties.  The 
judgment is affirmed.  Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.