Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald Trecker, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-ronald-trecker-appellant-12968
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12968
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Ronald+Trecker%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald Trecker, Appellant.
Case Number:  72323
Handdown Date:  03/31/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Emmett M. O'Brien
Counsel for Appellant:  N. Scott Rosenblum and Gregory N. Wittner
Counsel for Respondent:  Ann R. Littell
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Ronald Trecker, Defendant, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of unlawful use of a 
weapon in violation of section 571.030.1(4), RSMo Cum. Supp. 1997.  The trial court sentenced him to pay a fine of 
$2,500.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.  A written opinion 
would serve no jurisprudential purpose and we affirm by summary order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).  We have, however, 
prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.  We affirm the 
judgment.  
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.