Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy L. Franklin, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-roy-l-franklin-appellant-18421
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=18421
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Roy+L.+Franklin%2C+Appellant&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy L. Franklin, Appellant
Case Number:  53361
Handdown Date:  12/16/1997
Appeal From:  Jackson County Circuit Court, Hon. Wayne Strothmann
Counsel for Appellant:  Krene Karns
Counsel for Respondent:  Philip M. Koppe
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:   AFFIRMED.  Spinden, P.J.; Stith, Smith, JJ. 
Opinion:
ORDER
Roy Franklin appeals his conviction for first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle.  He claims that the trial court 
erred in denying him a mistrial after inadmissible evidence of other crimes was admitted.   We disagree and hold that the 
trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial.  Finding no precedential value to our 
decision, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for 
our decision.  Rule 30.25(b). 
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.