Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Suzanne M. Wahl, Appellant.
Case Number: ED79634
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-suzanne-m-wahl-appellant-d79634
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=15000
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Suzanne+M.+Wahl%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Suzanne M. Wahl, Appellant.
Case Number:  ED79634
Handdown Date:  04/16/2002
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Michael T. Jamison
Counsel for Appellant:  Party Acting Pro Se
Counsel for Respondent:  Robert P. McCulloch and Cleveland A. Tyson, Jr.
Opinion Summary: 
Suzanne M. Wahl appeals from the judgment entered following jury verdict finding her guilty of prostitution, 
section 567.020, RSMo 2000.  She was sentenced to pay a fine of $300.00.  
AFFIRMED.
Division Five holds: The court did not err in sentencing Wahl because her action violates section 567.020.
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Paul J. Simon, Judge
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  J. Dowd, C.J., and Hoff, J., concur.
Opinion:
Suzanne M. Wahl, defendant, appeals from the judgment entered following the jury verdict finding her guilty of 
prostitution, section 567.020 RSMo (2000).  Defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $300.00.
Defendant was tried jointly with her husband and raises the same three points her husband raised in State v. 
Thomas L. Wahl, No. ED 79631, handed down this same date.  For the same reasons set forth in her husband's case, we 
affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Separate Opinion:
None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.