Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrone Ford, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/state-of-missouri-respondent-v-tyrone-ford-appellant-12810
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12810
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Tyrone+Ford%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=28&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 28; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri, text: conviction)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrone Ford, Appellant.
Case Number:  71959
Handdown Date:  04/21/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Bernhardt C. Drumm
Counsel for Appellant:  Emmett Queener
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, III, and Gregory L. Barnes
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Opinion modified by Court's own motion on June 23, 1998.  This substitution does not constitute a new 
opinion.
Defendant appeals from the judgment following his conviction by a jury for burglary in the first degree in violation 
of section 569.160, RSMo 1994; unlawful use of a weapon in violation of section 571.031.1(4), RSMo 1994; kidnapping in 
violation of section 565.110, RSMo 1994; forcible rape in violation of section 566.030, RSMo 1994; forcible sodomy in 
violation of section 568.050, RSMo 1994; and three counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 
1994.  Defendant was sentenced by the court as a prior offender to a total of twenty-nine years imprisonment. 
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the 
principles of law.  However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting 
forth the facts and reasons for this order.  We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Separate Opinion:

None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.