Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Teresa L. Wright, Respondent, v. Phillip Wayne Wright, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/teresa-l-wright-respondent-v-phillip-wayne-wright-appellant-17777
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17777
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Teresa+L.+Wright%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Phillip+Wayne+Wright%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)
- Family Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/family?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=family&ott_archive_query=Teresa+L.+Wright%2C+Respondent%2C+v.+Phillip+Wayne+Wright%2C+Appellant.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=4&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+custody&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: family; source: text; score: 4; evidence: text: custody)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
Case Style:  Teresa L. Wright, Respondent, v. Phillip Wayne Wright, Appellant.
Case Number:  No. 52603
Handdown Date:  07/15/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. J.D. Williamson
Counsel for Appellant:  Robert C. Paden
Counsel for Respondent:  Kevin W. Kenney
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Breckenridge, P.J., Smart and Smith, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R
Phillip Wayne Wright (Husband) appeals from the trial court's order dissolving his marriage to Teresa Lou Wright 
(Wife).  Husband claims the trial court erred by: (1) awarding custody of the parties' two minor children to Wife because 
the custody decision was not supported by the evidence and erroneously applied the law; (2) ordering Husband to pay 
$2,500 of Wife's attorney fees because Wife was capable of paying her own fees and was guilty of financial misconduct; 
and (3) awarding Wife all property currently in her possession because it is a misapplication of the law to award 
nonmarital property to anyone other than the owner of it.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.