Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Thomas Mark Smith, Appellant, v. Ouida Jan Smith, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: 1997-06-10
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: family-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/thomas-mark-smith-appellant-v-ouida-jan-smith-respondent-17695
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=17695
Related Practice Areas:
- Family Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/family?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=family&ott_archive_query=Thomas+Mark+Smith%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Ouida+Jan+Smith%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+family-law%3B+text%3A+dissolution&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: family; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: family-law, text: dissolution, text: custody, text: child support)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Thomas Mark Smith, Appellant, v. Ouida Jan Smith, Respondent.
Case Number:  No. 70735
Handdown Date:  06/17/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Barbara W. Wallace
Counsel for Appellant: 
Counsel for Respondent: 
Opinion Summary: 
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  Per Curiam
Opinion Vote:  Before Russell, P.J.; Simon and Karohl, JJ.
Opinion:
Substitute for Order and Memorandum filed:  June 10, 1997

O R D E R
Thomas Mark Smith (Father) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of Ouida 
Jan Smith (Mother) on her Motion to Modify Dissolution Decree as to custody and child support.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).   An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the 
principles of law would have no precedential value.  A memorandum, solely for the uses of the parties involved, has been 
provided explaining the reasons for our holdings.
Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.