Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Troy L. Robbins, Appellant, v. Elizabeth A. Robbins, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: family-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/troy-l-robbins-appellant-v-elizabeth-a-robbins-respondent-13253
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13253
Related Practice Areas:
- Family Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/family?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=family&ott_archive_query=Troy+L.+Robbins%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+Elizabeth+A.+Robbins%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=26&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+family-law%3B+text%3A+dissolution&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: family; source: tag; score: 26; evidence: tag: family-law, text: dissolution, text: custody, text: visitation)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Troy L. Robbins, Appellant, v. Elizabeth A. Robbins, Respondent.
Case Number:  72896
Handdown Date:  05/05/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Melvyn W. Wiesman
Counsel for Appellant:  Lawrence G. Gillespie
Counsel for Respondent:  Maia Brodie
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crahan, C.J., Teitelman, J., and Crist, Sr.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant Troy L. Robbins (Father) appeals from the judgment sustaining the motion of Respondent Elizabeth 
Robbins (Mother) to modify the decree of dissolution.  In the judgment, the trial court allowed Mother to relocate the minor 
children to Minnesota and amended the custody and visitation terms of the original decree.  
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal.   We find the judgment is supported by 
substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and does not erroneously declare or misapply the law. 
Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We 
affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.